'Attack against India designed by Nawaz Sharif' Pakistan minister's big claim

In a startling revelation that has reignited discussions about South Asian geopolitics, a senior Pakistani official has attributed the recent military operation against India to former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's direct supervision. This unexpected claim puts the spotlight back on one of Pakistan's most influential political figures at a critical moment in Indo-Pak relations.

Azma Bukhari, Punjab's Information Minister, boldly asserted during a Wednesday press conference that "the whole operation against India was designed under the supervision of former prime minister and PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif." Her statement characterizes him as no ordinary leader, emphasizing that "his work speaks for itself."

The three-time prime minister, who led Pakistan during the pivotal 1999 Kargil conflict, has historically maintained a complex position on India. While Nawaz Sharif has publicly advocated for diplomatic solutions, this latest revelation suggests his involvement in Pakistan's recent military response following India's "Operation Sindoor" — a targeted strike

against terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

What makes this particularly intriguing is the apparent contradiction between Sharif's public peace overtures and his alleged behind-the-scenes strategic involvement. Just days before this revelation, he posted on social media that "Pakistan is a peace-loving country and prefers peace, but also knows how to defend itself," congratulating the country's leadership after the ceasefire agreement.

This development raises important questions about leadership dynamics in international conflicts. For young professionals and future leaders, it highlights the complex interplay between public diplomacy and national security decisions that often unfold behind closed doors.

As tensions between the nuclear neighbors gradually de-escalate, Nawaz Sharif's role serves as a compelling case study in how veteran politicians navigate the delicate balance between projecting peaceful intentions while safeguarding perceived national interests.